Skip to main content

How to Modify Your Divorce Decree

If there has been a substantial change in circumstances, you may have a case for decree modification.  This process can be a big waste of resources and time if you don't plan carefully. You may also want to consider whether you can solve the problem through mediation.
  • Decree Modification Requires a Substantial Change in Circumstances

You must show that there is a substantial change in circumstances. This is perhaps the most important preliminary question to consider. If your divorce decree is only a few months old, it is unlikely that the court will find there was a substantial change in circumstances. Your case will be much more difficult to prove the sooner you bring it after your divorce is finalized. There may be a situation, however, in which a substantial change in circumstances has occurred, even though a small amount of time has passed. If you are in doubt, you should consult with us or another attorney to determine the strength of a decree modification.
Here are some examples of things that may be a substantial change in circumstances: (1) You are moving, and parent time cannot continue as it has been; (2) your ex has not been seeing the children as much as the decree says they are allowed to; (3) your work circumstances have changed and you have more time to spend with your children; (4) your ex-spouse has developed a substance abuse addiction; or (5) you have reason to believe that your children are otherwise in danger with the current parent-time arrangement.
If you have questions about your situation, schedule an appointment with us now!
  • Temporary Orders In A Decree Modification?

You may remember that you had temporary orders during your divorce or custody case. You can also get temporary orders to modify your divorce decree. Temporary orders are more difficult to get during a decree modification, and can be a waste of resources unless you have the right circumstances. You may be able to temporarily modify your parent time or custody if you can show an immediate and irreparable harm threatening your children, or you both have agreed to the change. The court will also consider the best interests of the children.
If the court modifies parent time and/or custody, they may also modify child support. This hearing may be a good time to discuss other issues.
  • What Parts of the Decree Can I Modify?

You can modify any part of the decree that is necessary to address your substantial change in circumstances. For example, if your child is now a teenager, you may want to modify not only your custody arrangements, but also your parenting plan. If your circumstances have changed and you have time to watch the children more, you may want to change parent time, or add in a right of first refusal. There can be any number of reasons to modify your decree. If you are wondering whether you have the ability to modify the decree, but are not sure, give us a call!
  • How do I Start My Modification?

You can begin to modify your decree the same way you began your petition for divorce or custody. First you will need to write out your modification petition, then you will need to file it with the court and serve it on the opposing party. After that, you will need to determine what the next step is. You can seek temporary orders, a custody evaluation, or conduct discovery. If you are feeling overwhelmed, Solon Law provides excellent guidance. 

If you're set on pursuing decree modification on your own, Solon Law can be a great resource for reviewing your documents, drafting documents or appearing on your behalf on a limited basis. Give us a call so we can find a way to help you!


Popular posts from this blog

Thoughts on a Right To Remain Silent

I recently had the opportunity to do a preliminary hearing for a woman who was charged with obstruction of justice. The charge was dismissed with prejudice because the a local city with an infamously incompetent police force improperly charged her. I had several thoughts after this victory, ranging from how great my performance was, to how significant my mistakes were in spite of my victory. I'll go over what I felt I did right and wrong in the hopes that it will benefit some other attorney, or myself, at some point. What Happened A woman was charged with Obstruction of Justice, which is a fairly long statute. The situation was that a police officer came to her home to investigate a crime. Her son had some active warrants, but the police officer didn't know that at the time. The officer had both the son and the woman outside, asking them questions about his investigation. He then asked her for her personal info. Then he asked the son. The son gave the officer incorrect inform…

Utah Needs Its Own Family Court

The current system in Utah for dealing with divorce and other domestic issues is that it must go through commissioners who act as gatekeepers to the assigned judge. Cases are under the jurisdiction of the District Court, and if a case ever makes it to trial, a judge will ultimately rule on it. The Utah Rules of Civil Procedure govern domestic law and all other civil cases. It should seem wrong to have one set of rules for medical malpractice and divorce cases. What follows are the top reasons why Utah needs its own Family Law Court. 1. Commissioners are an Inelegant Solution To Time Saving. Commissioners specifically handle domestic matters. They hear everything from temporary orders in divorce actions to protective orders against a cohabitant. A commissioner's singular focus gives them unparalleled expertise. They hear far more domestic issues than judges, as most cases rarely make it to trial. But Commissioners lack one crucial thing: actual authority. Although they can issue o…

The Right To Free Speech And Michelle Carter

Michelle Carter The Manslaughterer, or "How I Was Convicted Of A Felony For Saying Words" Recently, a young woman named Michelle Carter was found guilty of manslaughter for texting her boyfriend to carry out his suicide plans. The text messages are difficult to read and are emotionally confusing. In some instances, Ms. Carter is urging him to end his life, while later she claims that she loves him. Some of the final text messages show that Ms. Carter was panicking at the thought of her boyfriend dying and was desperately seeking help.
This is an important case in our history because it is directly affecting our rights to free speech. Ms. Carter's actions are certainly reprehensible. Why encourage someone who is struggling with such things? If you truly love them, why encourage suicide? I'm not here to talk about whether what she said was morally reprehensible. Were Ms. Carter's text messages protected speech?
Protected Speech?
I’m concerned with the recent devel…